Cr4Bdbgs

Why so expensive? Take ‘California Gurls.’ It features Snoop Dogg. He’s pricey. And the producers on the song — Dr. Luke and Max Martin (among others)— who charge around $100,000 per song. And there are 12 tracks on the album.

Then there’s Katy Perry’s advance. “That advance could have been perhaps a million dollars net, maybe two million — I can’t say for certain,” Tavel says. (…)

Next expense: Getting the album played on Top 40 radio. Andy Tavel says it could cost up to $250,000 just to get the first single played on radio — special promotions, free merchandise, and presents. (…)

Tavel figures the album cost the label somewhere around $4 million.

They made all that — and much more — on the sales of Katy Perry singles. (…)

Here’s what Katy Perry sold in the United States: 2 million albums and 25 million digital tracks.

Katy Perry’s Perfect Game.” (via marathonpacks)

Another reminder of the fallacy questionable usefulness of industrial critiques of the music industry (as opposed to spending more time examining other sectors of the entertainment industry). The reason I tend way more toward aesthetics in the music arena and somewhat more toward industry in television and film is that the most expensive pop tends to scrape the barrier of entry for film and television, whereas the barrier of entry for music is genuinely more democratic/accessible.

  1. cureforbedbugs reblogged this from marathonpacks
  2. marathonpacks posted this
Blog comments powered by Disqus